Religious Protection Laws in the United States
An Historical Timeline of the So-called “Blaine”
Amendments
The separation of religious activities from government functions has
been cherished in the United States for over 200 years. Indeed, many of
our Nation’s immigrants journeyed to America to escape state
sponsored religious discrimination and coercion.
Amendments to
state constitutions that support this fundamental concept were adopted
and continue to be enforced as a way to protect the religious freedom of
all citizens. During recent years, attempts have been made to revise or
to altogether delete these state constitutional amendments to facilitate
the privatization of government functions, in particular, those
associated with public education.
Sending children to religious
schools using taxpayer funded vouchers and tuition tax credits are two
strategies the privatizers view as ways to accomplish their goal but
state religious protection laws stand in their way.
The following
information is not intended to be a comprehensive listing of the history
of U.S. religious protection law. Rather, it highlights some of the
more significant efforts citizens and elected officials have undertaken
to preserve a uniquely American freedom.

Bill of Rights. First Amendment:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.” —
Amendment I to the United States
Constitution, December 15, 1791.[1]
Thomas Jefferson writes a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association
in 1802 explaining why he did not support national days of fasting and
thanksgiving. His letter contained the phrase "wall of separation
between church and state," which lead to the Establishment Clause to which we currently adhere: "Separation of
church and state.” The section appearing in bold type —
from his original draft — was deleted by Jefferson to avoid
offending party members.[2]
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely
between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith
or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions
only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act
of the whole American people which declared that their legislature
should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of
separation between church and state. [Congress thus inhibited
from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to
execute their acts, I have refrained from presenting even occasional
performances of devotion presented indeed legally where an Executive is
the legal head of a national church, but subject here, as religious
exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each
respective sect.] Adhering to this expression of the supreme
will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see
with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to
restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right
in opposition to his social duties.” [3]
The Free School Society, a New York City group which ran
non-sectarian schools, protested plans proposed by a Baptist church to
open a school for poor children using public funds. The Free School
Society believed public funds should not be used to support sectarian
schools. [4]
The Michigan legislature adopts its
church-state separation amendment to their constitution, the first to do
so upon becoming a state [5] and retained similar restrictions
in 1970.[6] A total of 19 states adopted similar language
before Blaine proposed his Constitutional Amendment in December
1875.[7]
The Roman Catholic bishop of New York City began to lobby for
government funding of the City’s Catholic schools setting off
debates that lasted until 1894 when New York adopted constitutional
language prohibiting the state from funding sectarian schools.
[8]
First compulsory school attendance laws adopted by
Massachusetts.[9]
New York followed Massachusetts’ lead by establishing a public
school system. By 1918 all states had laws for compulsory school
attendance.[10]
Pope Pius IX issued his
“Syllabus of Errors”, repudiating the concept of religious
freedom by seeking favored treatment of Catholicism by all governments.
[11]
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the practice of Protestant Bible
reading in the state’s public schools was sectarian.[12]
This case was precipitated by a Cincinnati school board resolution of
1869 that prohibited religious instruction in the city’s public
schools. [13]
President Ulysses S. Grant supported the idea of a constitutional
amendment that would require states to establish systems of public
schools free from sectarian influences and bar appropriations of tax aid
to religious schools. In a speech given in September 1875 Grant said
states should “Encourage free schools, and resolve that not one
dollar, appropriated for their support, shall be appropriated to the
support of any sectarian schools.”[14] Later that same
year, Grant again advocated for a Constitutional Amendment that would
result in “making it the duty of each of the several states to
establish and forever maintain free public schools adequate to the
education of all children . . . [and] forbidding the teaching in said
schools of religious, atheistic or pagan tenets.”[15]
James Blaine proposed his amendment to the federal Constitution and
introduced it in Congress on December 14, 1875. Easily passing a House
vote the Amendment died in the Senate in 1876. [16]
Congress passed a law requiring that every
state admitted to the Union after 1876 put a provision in its
constitution stating that it would maintain a public school system
“free from sectarian control.”[17]
Legislators in New York changed the
state constitution, adding language to prohibit public funds from being
given to religious schools.[18]
New York retains church-state
separation language in revised state constitution.[19]
Florida
retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[20]
Michigan retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[21]
North
Carolina retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[22]
Montana
retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[23]
Lawmakers held a constitutional
convention to update Louisiana’s outdated constitution. Strong
lobbying efforts by the Roman Catholic Church lead to the removal of the
state’s religious protection law and voters then ratified the new
constitution. As a result, millions of dollars in state aid have been
distributed to parochial schools even though the state’s public
school system has been regarded as one of the worst in the
nation.[24]
Minnesota retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[25]
Wisconsin
retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[26]
Sixty-two percent of voters in largely
Catholic Massachusetts rejected a proposal to remove religious
protection laws language.[27]
Georgia retains church-state separation language in revised state
constitution.[28]
In
Massachusetts, 70 percent of voters chose to retain their religious
protection law.[29]
Voters in California and Michigan
rejected referenda that would have repealed church-state separation
language and allowed the use of publicly funded vouchers in their
states.[30]
Circuit court Judge P. Kevin Davey
declared Florida’s voucher law unconstitutional finding that the
“clear and unambiguous” language in the state’s
constitution clearly prohibits the practice of delivering public funds
to religious schools. The state has appealed the ruling.[31]
The U.S. Supreme Court agrees to
hear arguments resulting from Washington state’s Locke v.
Davey case where a college student was denied public support to
complete his theological studies.[32] On December 2, 2003,
the U.S. Supreme Court began hearing arguments in the case.[33]
After the Colorado legislature passed its state funded voucher plan
the Colorado PTA filed suit stating that the plan violates sections of
Colorado’s Constitution that prohibit public funds from being used
to support private and religious schools. Attorneys from the Colorado
Education Association and National Education Association represented the
PTA in the suit.[34] National organizations supported the
lawsuit. They included the American Civil Liberties Union, American
Federation of Teachers, American Jewish Committee, American Jewish
Congress, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, League of
United Latin American Citizens, National Education Association, the
NAACP, National PTA, and People for the American Way
Foundation.[35] On December 3, 2003, a Colorado district
court decided in favor of the plaintiffs.[36]
Endnotes
1 About the First Amendment, The First Amendment Center
2 Jefferson's Wall of Separation Letter, The Constitution Society
3 ibid.
4 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
5 Matthew J. Brouillette, "School Choice in Michigan: A Primer for Freedom in Education," The Mackinac Center for Public Policy, 1999, p. 10.
6 David W. Kirkpatrick, "The Pain of Blaine (Amendments) Is On the Wane?," August 2003.
7 David W. Kirkpatrick, "The Pain of Blaine (Amendments) Is On the Wane?," August 2003. Kirkpatrick listed only 18 states in his article failing to include Michigan in his list of states adopting church-state separation amendments to their constitutions.
8 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
9 ibid.
10 ibid.
11 ibid.
12 ibid.
13 Steven Samson, "Christianity in Nineteenth Century American Law," ANTITHESIS, May/June 1991 - Volume 2, Number 2. (No longer in print) In Board of Education of Cincinnati v. Minor, 23 Ohio St. 211 (1872), the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the Cincinnati Board of Education decision to bar religious instruction in the public schools.
14 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
15 ibid.
16 The Blaine Amendment, The J. M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies, Baylor University
17 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
18 ibid.
19 Duane Motley, School Choice and the Blaine Amendment, New Yorker's Family Research Foundation
20 The Blaine Diversion, People For the American Way
21 ibid.
22 North Carolina Constitution, Article IX, Section 6, 7
23 Montana Constitution, Article X, Section 6
24 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
25 Minnesota Constitution, Article I. Article I, Sect. 16, (generally revised Nov, 5, 1974)
26 Wisconsin Constitution, Article I. Article I, Sect. 18, (as amended Nov. 1982)
27 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
28 The Blaine Diversion, People For the American Way
29 Rob Boston, "The Blaine Game," Church & State, September 2002, Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
30 ibid.
31 Florida Voucher Law Struck Down Again, The Freedom Forum, August 5, 2002
32 Resources on Locke v. Davey, The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
33 ibid.
34 What's New?, Where's the lawsuit now?, Colorado Education Association
35 Constitutionality of Voucher Program Challenged, CEA press release
36 Colorado Voucher Law Struck Down by District Court, People For the American Way